Legalbrief
  Subscriber login (email address):
Tue 07 September 2010

Advanced Search

Home Pages

Legalbrief Today
Legalbrief Judgments
Legalbrief Africa
eLaw & Management
Legalbrief Forensic
Legalbrief Environmental

For Your Info

About Legalbrief
Vision & Mission
Quotations & Subscriptions
Advertise with Us
Contact Us
Terms & Conditions






Specialist Sections

Financial Supplement
Legal Links
Events Calendar







This site is updated Monday to Friday by 9.00am




  

Judiciary under siege? You be the judge…

The less-than-subtle attempts of the ANC to undermine the credibility of the judiciary are a hallmark of the ANC under new leader and SA President-elect Jacob Zuma, writes Legalbrief. And the apparent divisions on the Bench – the stand-off between Cape Judge President John Hlophe and the Constitutional Court judges being the most public example – parallel those in the party where the divide between the Zuma and Mbeki factions appears to be deepening. As a result we have witnessed a series of attacks on judges by members of the ANC, its alliance partners (Cosatu and the SA Communist Party) and the ANC Youth League.

It began in May 2008 with a public statement from the Constitutional Court outlining what it considered to be an inappropriate attempt by Hlophe to influence the court’s deliberations in the matter of the appeal by Zuma and others against a Supreme Court of Appeal decision validating the search warrants used against the ANC president to gather evidence for his pending corruption trial. Since then the stand-off has escalated through a series of leaks to the media, with Hlophe suggesting the country’s top two judges, Chief Justice Pius Langa and his deputy, Dikang Moseneke, are bound in a political conspiracy against him; the Constitutional Court outlining its case against Hlophe; Zuma’s lawyer writing a letter to the court darkly hinting that it might be compromised by the Hlophe matter in its deliberations on Zuma; and the ANC, through its secretary-general, Gwede Mantashe, calling the judges ‘counter-revolutionary’ and claiming they are working against Zuma becoming President. The ANC and Zuma have denied there is an orchestrated campaign to undermine the independence of the judiciary, or that SA is facing a constitutional crisis.

We have collated the events (ordered by date with the latest articles appearing at the top) that have led to this state of affairs to help you be the judge…

Judicial independence must be respected for 'sake of poor' - DA [L]
In the battle to eradicate poverty in SA, its leaders should take a firmer stand on the key issues of judicial independence and property rights, the DA said yesterday.

The Dispensable Judiciary
Not just Polokwane

Not since the 1950s has there been such a sustained attack on the highest court. Then the attack was the result of a clash between pushing through political ideology on the one hand and a court's determination to preserve its own independence on the other. There the battle was fought out in the courts in what is known as the 'High Court of Parliament' case.

ANC has faith in judiciary, but it's not above criticism - Zuma
ANC president Jacob Zuma has finally broken his silence on the stand-off created by the ANC and its alliance partners with the judiciary, reaffirming his party's faith in the Bench, but adding it was not above criticism and transformation.

Mbeki has already reassured De Klerk over judicial independence
President Thabo Mbeki has written a letter to South Africa's last white president FW de Klerk, assuring him that the state is committed to judicial independence.

De Klerk asks Mbeki to protect judiciary
Former President FW de Klerk has urged President Thabo Mbeki to act to protect the judiciary from attack in line with his constitutional duty as head of state.

JSC is not neutral, says PAC [L]
The Constitution and the judiciary are not 'God-ordained entities that function outside the realm and exigencies of an evolving society', says Thami Ka Plaatjie, acting president of the PAC, in an attack on the conduct of Justice Pius Langa in The Star.

Zuma debate dividing the nation
Whether South Africa's President-in-waiting Jacob Zuma should be prosecuted for corruption is dividing the nation, writes E-Brief News. Newspapers have devoted acres of space to the debate, which sets those who advocate that the rule of law should be allowed to take its course against the Zuma faction in the African National Congress (ANC), which says any trial of the ruling party president will be unfair, given the length of time the matter has been kicked around in the courts and allegations - without an iota of hard evidence - that Zuma is being set up by President Thabo Mbeki.

Judiciary, politicians remain in the spotlight
In another dramatic week for politicians and the judiciary in South Africa, a commission of inquiry set up by a provincial Premier and headed by a High Court judge was found by a full Bench of the High Court to be unconstitutional and a means to achieve a political end, writes E-Brief News.

Pityana criticises judge-bashing [L]
University of South Africa Vice-Chancellor Barney Pityana has condemned the recent flood of criticism of the judiciary and academics by ANC alliance leaders in a report in The Times. He also cautions against the use of the language of violence, saying this is undermining 'that which we purport to advance'.

Constitutional Court 'not in disarray'
Leading members of the legal profession interviewed for a Mail & Guardian report have dismissed suggestions that the Constitutional Court is in disarray and that it suffers from poor leadership. They were responding to media suggestions this week that the reluctance of leading figures from the legal profession to serve in the country's highest court was a reaction to low morale and a lack of leadership by Chief Justice Pius Langa.

Dignity of ConCourt must be protected - Chaskalson
Former Chief Justice Arthur Chaskalson has dismissed suggestions that the turmoil surrounding the Constitutional Court is scaring away candidates for appointment to the court. In an interview with The Times yesterday, Chaskalson said many factors - including a daunting public interview - could explain why only five candidates applied for a vacancy on the Constitutional Court Bench.

Chalkalson defends judiciary [L]
Former Chief Justice Arthur Chaskalson has defended the judiciary, which has been under attack from various members of the ANC and its alliance partners in recent weeks.

Vavi says Cosatu does not disrespect the judiciary
It is a 'media myth' that Cosatu does not respect the independence of the judiciary, the union's general secretary Zwelinzima Vavi said on Wednesday.

Law Society repeats calls for respect for judiciary
The Law Society of South Africa (LSSA) has repeated its call for respect for the judiciary and for a cessation of attacks on judges in their personal capacities, says a LSSA in a statement on the Legalbrief Today site.

Langa calls for end to unjustified attacks [L]
Chief Justice Pius Langa says judges should be protected from unjustified attacks. His comments follow a stream of criticism of the judiciary, particularly from the ruling ANC and its alliance partners, notes a report on the SABC News site. Langa says criticism of the judiciary should be informed and have merit.

Seeds of judicial assault sown in 1994 - Leon [L]
The seeds of the ongoing political assault on the judiciary were sown in 1994, when the ANC used race to bring the judges to heel, former DA leader Tony Leon argues in a report in the Mail & Guardian.

The future of 'Transformative Constitutionalism' in South Africa
Ten years ago in an article published in the South African Journal on Human Rights, Prof. Karl Klare - a leading intellectual light in the critical legal studies movement - described the South African Constitution as a transformative document.

Seeds of judicial assault sown in 1994 - Leon [L]
The seeds of the ongoing political assault on the judiciary were sown in 1994, when the ANC used race to bring the judges to heel, former DA leader Tony Leon argues in a report in the Mail & Guardian.

Law Society repeats calls for respect for judiciary
The Law Society of South Africa (LSSA) has repeated its call for respect for the judiciary and for a cessation of attacks on judges in their personal capacities, says a LSSA in a statement on the Legalbrief Today site.

Political backlash builds over RAF payments ruling
A political backlash against lawyers and judges is gaining momentum following last week's Cape High Court ruling suspending the Road Accident Fund's new payment system, writes E-Brief News. Yesterday the SA Commuter Organisation (Saco), the SA National Civic Organisation and the SA Transport and Allied Workers Union (Satawu) slammed the court's ruling overturning the RAF system that would have seen compensation paid directly into the bank accounts of victims as opposed to those of their lawyers.

Judge biased, Law Society racist, says RAF boss
The Road Accident Fund's (RAF) chief executive, Jacob Modise, has become the latest public figure to openly criticise the judiciary, accusing the Cape Acting Judge President of bias, says a Cape Times report.

Sunday Times 'eagerly awaiting' Mbeki legal challenge
President Thabo Mbeki should appoint an independent judicial inquiry to probe whether SA multi-billion rand arms deal was corrupt, say an editorial in the Sunday Times, pointing out that such an inquiry has been demanded by local political parties, religious leaders and anti-corruption activists.

Brothers plead for release of 'dying' Shaik [L]
Yunis and Mo Shaik are seeking the release of their brother, Schabir, into correctional supervision at home or 'some kind of parole'.

GCB urges condemnation of attacks on judiciary
The General Council of the Bar, calling for an end to 'intemperate and ill-considered' attacks on the judiciary, says it is 'deeply concerned by the failure of national leaders to condemn' such attacks.

Law Society slams attacks on judiciary [L]
Council members of the Law Society of South Africa (LSSA) have expressed grave concern at the unrelenting, improper and thoughtless attacks on the Chief Justice, the judiciary and other institutions of justice in recent weeks.

ANC continues attacks on judiciary
The ANC's unrelenting attack on the NPA and the judiciary continued outside the Pietermaritzburg High Court yesterday while the party's president Jacob Zuma asked the court to scrap his corruption case. A report in Business Day says that while Zuma's legal team did battle inside the court, his backers went on the attack by criticising the case, putting the party on a collision course with the judiciary.

Langa calls for defence of judicial independence
Chief Justice and head of the Constitutional Court Pius Langa has called on every state organ and component of civil society to defend the independence of the judiciary, says a City Press report. Langa, who was delivering the KwaZulu-Natal Law Society's Inaugural Ismail Mahomed Memorial lecture on Friday, lashed out at those who have criticised the judiciary.

Crucial Zuma ConCourt ruling due today
The long-awaited Constitutional Court judgment on the validity of searches relating to the corruption investigation against ANC president Jacob Zuma and arms company Thint - described by one academic as the most important decision in the court's history - will be handed down today.

Delays in trial are in Zuma's favour, argues consultant
One who believes Zuma has a strong argument is Johannesburg legal consultant Brenda Wardle. In an article in Business Day she points out that Section 35(3)(d) of the Constitution guarantees the right to a speedy trial thus; that the interim Constitution of 1993 contained a corresponding provision for a 'public trial within a reasonable time after having been charged'; and that both the Canadian Charter and the US Constitution contain similar provisions.

Bar Council concerned over attacks on judiciary [L]
Attacks on judges threaten the foundation of the rule of law, the General Council of the Bar of SA said yesterday.

End of the constitutional dance? [L]
Noting that the future of the constitutional project depends on co-operation rather than confrontation between the government and the courts, the Mail & Guardian Online's Serjeant at the Bar columnist holds out little optimism for the future well-being of the Constitution following recent attacks on the judiciary by the ANC and its cohorts in the alliance.

Zuma pledges to defend judicial independence [L]
With just a week to go before his bid to halt his corruption trial is heard by the Pietermaritzburg High Court, ANC president Jacob Zuma says undermining the independence of the judiciary is a threat to democracy.

My most difficult decision - Hlophe [L]
Cape Judge President John Hlophe has described his action against Constitutional Court judges - he has approached the Johannesburg High Court to declare the action by the Constitutional Court judges of laying a complaint against him without affording him an opportunity to reply unlawful - as the most difficult decision he has ever had to make.

Why the JSC hearing should not be held in secret [L]
There are compelling reasons why it would offend the Constitution for the JSC hearing into the matter involving Cape Judge President John Hlophe and the Constitutional Court justices to be held in secret, argues Mario Milo, a partner at Webber Wentzel, in an article in The Independent on Sunday.

Defence of Zuma at fever pitch
With the start of Jacob Zuma's corruption trial just over a week away, the public defence of the ANC president has reached a crescendo of intensity, with the judiciary, the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) and the NPA all taking flak in different forums yesterday, writes E-Brief News.

Hlophe wants permission to sue ConCourt judges
Cape Judge President John Hlophe knows he is wading into 'uncharted territory' but has told the High Court that he has 'no choice' but to ask it for relief against what he believes is the unconstitutional conduct of the country's top judges, including Chief Justice Pius Langa.

ConCourt censured by ANC, says academic [L]
Professor George Devenish, of the University of KwaZulu-Natal, has entered the fray in the saga involving Constitutional Court judges and Cape Judge President John Hlophe. In a letter in Business Day, he says the integrity and esteem of the Constitutional Court 'has been impugned in no small manner, as was epitomised by ANC Secretary-General Gwede Mantashe's rash and scurrilous accusation that the court has a counter-revolutionary agenda.'

Keep politicians away from judges - academic
It is understandable that proposals by the ANC to radically reorganise the judiciary will be viewed with alarm by those who understand and value the importance of an independent and impartial judiciary for a constitutional democracy.

Why Mantashe has a point...
In an in an insightful analysis in Business Day, Anthony Butler, an academic at UCT, takes sides with ANC secretary-general Gwede Mantashe, arguing judges cannot be 'treated as sacrosanct'.

Another politician lambastes judiciary [L]
In a rambling attack on the judiciary on the politicsweb site, Solly Mapaila, of the SA Communist Party, says it is 'reeling from one crisis to another'.

Afrikaans papers ask JSC for public hearings
Three Media24 newspapers have submitted a request to the Judicial Service Commission for the hearings on the matters of Cape Judge President John Hlophe and the Constitutional Court to be held in public. According to a Beeld report, the paper and its two sister publications, Die Burger and Volksblad, made the submission on Friday.

Not clear whether judges want open JSC hearing
It is still not clear whether the Constitutional Court judges or Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe would make submissions to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) on whether the hearing into their dispute should be held in public, notes a Business Day report.

ANC stands by right to criticise judges
The ANC says it will defend and support the 'independence, integrity and credibility' of state institutions and the judiciary, but also believes that free expression on the conduct of public officials contributes to 'vibrant debate'. A Business Day report quotes ANC secretary-general Gwede Mantashe as saying the protection and defence of the judiciary 'cannot mean we remain quiet about how they do their work.

ANC rejects claims that Mantashe attacked judiciary
The ANC has shrugged off criticisms that recent remarks by its Secretary-General, Gwede Mantashe, amounted to an attack on the independence of the judiciary.

ANC not on collision course with judiciary - Zuma
African National Congress (ANC) President Jacob Zuma says he has never acted 'unconstitutionally' and denies the ruling party is on a collision course with the judiciary, says a Business Day report. Neither is SA headed for a constitutional crisis, as has been suggested by some, he says.

ANC discusses merger of SCA and Constitutional Court
Transformation of the judiciary is high on the ANC's agenda, and discussions about the possibility of merging the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) are under way. The proposals are contained in a draft discussion document entitled 'Policy on the Transformation of the Administration of Justice', notes a Sunday Times report.

Judges plead for restraint on Hlophe-ConCourt matter [L]
The Heads of Court have called for media restraint in publishing comment of the stand-off between the Constitutional court and Cape Judge President John Hlophe.

Hlophe stand-off - is there a prima facie case?
The Judicial Service Commission's (JSC's) statement after it met on Saturday on two complaints involving judges of the Constitutional Court and Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe revealed more by what it did not say than by what it said.

ANC attacks a test for judicial independence
The ruling African National Congress' unrelenting attacks on the country's top judges are being seen as an important test of the judiciary's independence and a threat to the country's democracy.

JSC rejects Hlophe bid for recusal of five members
The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) will for the first time hold an inquiry that could be the prelude to the impeachment of a judge, after it rejected a request that five of its members should recuse themselves, says a report in the The Sunday Independent.

Hlophe argues ConCourt may have compromised JSC
Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe says the Constitutional Court's public statement accusing him of gross misconduct may have compromised the Judicial Service Commission's ability to give him a fair hearing, says a Cape Times report.

ConCourt's top two 'politically-motivated' - Hlophe
Cape Judge President John Hlophe has accused the country's top judges of not only lying to the public, but of exerting improper influence upon their junior colleagues in their campaign to remove him from office.

Hlophe's response arrives on extended deadline
Cape Judge President John Hlophe has filed his response with the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) following a complaint against him by Constitutional Court judges.

NPA not concerned about Hlophe effect on ConCourt rulings
ANC president Jacob Zuma's prosecutors say they don't share his concerns about the Cape Judge President John Hlophe debacle and its possible impact on the Constitutional Court's credibility.

Zuma gets involved in Hlophe matter
President-in-waiting Jacob Zuma's bid to fight off fraud and corruption charges has taken yet another extraordinary turn - with his lawyer writing to the Constitutional Court in a move that seems certain to have consequences for the Bench.

Are top judges being spied on?
Cape Judge President John Hlophe's alleged claim that he has 'national intelligence connections' and that he knew what was going on in the Constitutional Court has raised concerns that the country's top judges are being spied on, writes E-Brief News.

Jafta may be forced to explain private conversation with Hlophe
Acting Constitutional Court Judge Chris Jafta may be forced to divulge details of a private conversation that Cape Judge President John Hlophe had with him, suggests a Sunday Times report.

Political contamination of legal system growing [L]
The most grievous damage inflicted by the ANC's leadership struggle is the growing political contamination of our legal system, says a Mail & Guardian editorial.

Are our judges being spied on?
Cape Judge President John Hlophe's alleged claim that he has 'national intelligence connections' and that he knew what was going on in the Constitutional Court has raised concerns that the country's top judges are being spied on, writes E-Brief News.

'You're our last hope', judge allegedly told by Hlophe
Details of Cape Judge President John Hlophe's alleged efforts to influence the Constitutional Court to look kindly on ANC president Jacob Zuma's appeal against the validity of search and seizure warrants used to unearth information to be used against him at his corruption trial in August, have been laid bare in today's issue of Business Day, writes E-Brief News.

Battle of the judges becomes a 'dirty fight' [L]
It has taken a while, but the Constitutional Court appears finally to have convinced all and sundry that it is speaking with one voice on the issue of its complaint against Cape Judge President John Hlophe when a few days ago, courtesy of strategically placed leaks to the media, it looked as if it was split.

Judges united on Hlophe complaint
The Constitutional Court, which yesterday handed a 27-page document relating to its complaint against Cape Judge President John Hlophe to the Judicial Service Commission, is presenting a determined, united front on the issue, writes E-Brief News. A report in Beeld, for example, quotes Advocate Reggie Tokota SC, counsel for Judges Bess Nkabinde and Chris Jafta - the two whom Hlophe is alleged to have tried to influence - as saying there was no substance to claims that there was a rift between his clients and other members of the court.

Hlophe's alleged accuser advocated conciliation [L]
One of the judges alleged to have lodged a complaint against Cape Judge President John Hlophe - Judge Bess Nkabinde-Mmomo - helped to draw up rules for complaining about fellow judges, emphasising internal resolution.

Crisis deepens as top judges debate Hlophe complaint
The Constitutional Court, under siege from the man it alleges improperly tried to influence two of its members, spent hours yesterday debating how to back up its explosive complaint against Cape Judge President John Hlophe - and the meeting will continue today, writes E-Brief News.

Constitutional crisis looms in battle of the judges
Legal experts suggest the country is teetering on the edge of a constitutional crisis following Cape Judge President John Hlophe's allegation - made in a complaint to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) - that SA's top judges are politically-motivated.

Hlophe crisis deepens
The crisis in the judiciary deepened yesterday as the legal fraternity reacted to a 'declaration of war' by Cape Judge President John Hlophe on the Constitutional Court and on a variety of legal bodies and individual members of the profession, says a Cape Argus report.

Hlophe not lodging complaint with JSC
The lawyer representing Cape Judge President John Hlophe on Thursday denied reports that Hlophe is to lodge a counter-complaint with the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) against the Constitutional Court judges, the SABC reported.

Hlophe accuses top judges of abuse of authority
Cape Judge President John Hlophe went on official long leave last night - but not before slamming the country's top judges, accusing them of abusing their judicial authority by 'viciously' sacrificing him on the altar of public criticism.

Hlophe allegations 'won't impact on Zuma trial' - NPA
The allegations against Cape Judge President John Hlophe will have no impact on the criminal prosecution of ANC President Jacob Zuma, according to a report in Die Burger quoting a source from the 'inner circle' of the NPA.

ConCourt split over Hlophe matter?
More details of the alleged wrongdoings of Judge John Hlophe, as well as dark hints that the Constitutional Court is split over the complaint against the Cape Judge President, surfaced in the media at the weekend.

Hlophe case to be considered in July
The Judicial Services Commission (JSC) will only meet in a month's time to decide whether there is a prima facie case against Cape Judge President John Hlophe.

Hlophe meeting will decide 'way forward' - Howie
Today's urgent meeting of the Judicial Services Commission (JSC) to discuss allegations against Cape Judge President John Hlophe 'is not a trial yet'.

JSC meeting to cover 'procedural' questions
At a time when the legal fraternity is being forced to confront the issue of judicial ethics (see reports below), the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) is to meet behind closed doors at 11am tomorrow at the Airport Grand Hotel in Johannesburg to discuss whether to investigate allegations that Cape Judge President John Hlophe tried improperly to influence Constitutional Court judges in crucial cases involving ANC president Jacob Zuma.

New Bill will shroud JSC in secrecy
The secrecy that will soon shroud the workings of the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) will stand in sharp contrast to the events of the weekend when Chief Justice Pius Langa, head of the JSC, allowed the Constitutional Court to go public with its complaint against Cape High Court Judge President John Hlophe.

Friday meeting on Hlophe matter
The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) will have an urgent meeting on Friday to discuss the allegations against Cape Judge President John Hlophe, according to a report in Beeld.

GCB calls for transparency in handling Hlophe matter
The serious allegations against Judge President Hlophe strike at the heart of the legal profession and what the judiciary is and should be.

LSSA urges JSC to deal with complaint expeditiously
The Law Society of South Africa (LSSA) expresses its grave concern at the complaint lodged by the Constitutional Court judges against Cape Judge President John Hlophe.

AFT calls on JSC to act immediately on Hlophe complaint
The Executive of Advocates for Transformation (AFT) (WLD)) has learnt with shock allegations that the Judge President of the Cape High Court was involved in conduct which, if the allegations are supported by evidence, would amount to an attempt to influence the Constitutional Court on pending matters. AFT (WLD) views these allegations as very serious. AFT (WLD) considers the conduct complained of, if proven, to be detrimental to the proper functioning, integrity and credibility of our judicial system.

JSC urged to act swiftly on Hlophe matter
The Judicial Services Commission (JSC) must deal with Cape Judge President John Hlophe's alleged misconduct expeditiously, the Law Society of SA (LSSA) insisted yesterday, according to a report on the IoL site.

Top judge denies interference allegations
Opposition parties have reacted with outrage to the latest allegations against Cape Judge President John Hlophe, with some calling for his impeachment.

Hlophe denies trying to sway ConCourt decision
Opposition parties have reacted with outrage to the latest allegations against Cape Judge President John Hlophe, with some calling for his impeachment.

Hlophe must go - IFP
The fact that the latest complaint against judge Hlophe is laid by judges of the Constitutional Court, is conclusive proof that judge Hlophe is not a fit and proper person to hold the office of a judge of the High Court.

Stiff test for SA judiciary Independence, Zille notes
An accusation that Cape Judge President John Hlophe had attempted to influence a Constitutional Court decision in a case involving Jacob Zuma and a French arms manufacturing company was the 'biggest test yet' to the independence of South Africa's judiciary, Democratic Alliance (DA) leader Helen Zille said on Saturday.

Cape Bar Council's statement concerning Judge John Hlophe
The Cape Bar Council has noted with grave concern, the complaint referred to the Judicial Service Commission by the judges of the Constitutional Court, that the Judge President of the Cape High Court, Judge John Hlophe, has approached some judges of the Constitutional Court and tried to influence that Court's judgment in one or more cases. Conduct of this nature - the very antithesis of upholding the Constitution, the rule of law and the administration of justice without favour or prejudice - violates the dignity of the high office of a judge.

Concourt judges refer complaint against Judge Hlophe to JSC
Statement by the Judges of the Constitutional Court, 30 May 2008

Hlophe accused of attempting to influence Zuma court decision
Cape Judge President John Hlophe has been accused of attempting to influence the Constitutional Court's decision on search and seizure raids carried out by the Scorpions on properties of Jacob Zuma and French arms manufacturing giant Thint.



  


Legalbrief Today Links
About Legalbrief Today
News Categories
Newsletter Archives
Quotations and Subscriptions
Judgments listed by Court

Not a Subscriber?
REGISTER for a FREE trial subscription



Latest Legal Vacancies


SEE YOUR
JOB ADVERT HERE.
Email Lucille Faro for rates and placement options.



Register for a Free subscription to Legalbrief AFRICA, sponsored by the International Bar Association


Special Pages
Debate: Should racially exclusive organisations be allowed?
The Hlophe Debate
The Judging Judges Debate
The Affirmative Action Debate
The Hlophe Saga: Step by Step
The Judicial Amendment Bills
The Judiciary Under Siege?





News Feed

 Legalbrief Today


Read the latest issue of LEGALBRIEF TODAY




Latest Legal Vacancies


SEE YOUR
JOB ADVERT HERE.
Email Lucille Faro for rates and placement options.